<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Open Letter to Peter Mandelson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hannahnicklin.com/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-peter-mandelson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hannahnicklin.com/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-peter-mandelson/</link>
	<description>Playwright, blogger, academic, tech-enthusiast. Eco-anarcha-socialist-cyber-feminist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Share your Creative Freedom! Connection is a Right &#8211; stop the 40 day push! &#124; Fellow Creative</title>
		<link>http://www.hannahnicklin.com/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-peter-mandelson/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Share your Creative Freedom! Connection is a Right &#8211; stop the 40 day push! &#124; Fellow Creative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannahnicklin.com/?p=1129#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>[...] Nicklin&#8217;s recent Open Letter to Peter Mandelson was perfectly crafted, information packed and said everything it need to but as she pointed out in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nicklin&#8217;s recent Open Letter to Peter Mandelson was perfectly crafted, information packed and said everything it need to but as she pointed out in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The end of P2P? Or just the end of privacy? &#171; StasiNation</title>
		<link>http://www.hannahnicklin.com/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-peter-mandelson/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>The end of P2P? Or just the end of privacy? &#171; StasiNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannahnicklin.com/?p=1129#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>[...] in Octoberber, Hannah Nicklin wrote an open letter to Mandelson, setting out exactly why his law was an ass: You seem to be so eager for the Royal Mail to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Octoberber, Hannah Nicklin wrote an open letter to Mandelson, setting out exactly why his law was an ass: You seem to be so eager for the Royal Mail to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheWayoftheWeb &#187; UK Govt &#8211; tackling piracy but in court on privacy!</title>
		<link>http://www.hannahnicklin.com/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-peter-mandelson/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>TheWayoftheWeb &#187; UK Govt &#8211; tackling piracy but in court on privacy!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannahnicklin.com/?p=1129#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>[...] a nice, well-reasoned summary, read Hannah Nicklin&#8217;s open letter to Lord Mandelson &#8211; it includes plenty of useful links to relevant sources of information, including Ben [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a nice, well-reasoned summary, read Hannah Nicklin&#8217;s open letter to Lord Mandelson &#8211; it includes plenty of useful links to relevant sources of information, including Ben [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil M</title>
		<link>http://www.hannahnicklin.com/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-peter-mandelson/comment-page-1/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannahnicklin.com/?p=1129#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>Well said.

I&#039;m not sure at what point the government became such a blatant mouthpiece for people with enough money. Maybe it&#039;s always been like it and it&#039;s only because I&#039;ve recently become interested (and rapidly disenchanted) by politics.

If I could write half as eloquently as you, I&#039;d be doing it too. Maybe I should start. It strikes me that the only way our voice will be heard is through a combined ripple effect of many things such as this.

Filesharing has brought me unmeasurable amounts of aural happiness that otherwise I&#039;d never have known. Long may it continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure at what point the government became such a blatant mouthpiece for people with enough money. Maybe it&#8217;s always been like it and it&#8217;s only because I&#8217;ve recently become interested (and rapidly disenchanted) by politics.</p>
<p>If I could write half as eloquently as you, I&#8217;d be doing it too. Maybe I should start. It strikes me that the only way our voice will be heard is through a combined ripple effect of many things such as this.</p>
<p>Filesharing has brought me unmeasurable amounts of aural happiness that otherwise I&#8217;d never have known. Long may it continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah Nicklin</title>
		<link>http://www.hannahnicklin.com/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-peter-mandelson/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Nicklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannahnicklin.com/?p=1129#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>Have seen a few people reacting to the tone that the letter finishes on. It may come across as slightly extreme, but I believe that if simple facts and practicalities are going to be continually ignored, policy makers need to understand the reality of the matter. The simple fact is that the geek contingent will always be one step ahead of government in these matters, which is why they need a carrot, not stick, approach. That is what I am trying to get across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have seen a few people reacting to the tone that the letter finishes on. It may come across as slightly extreme, but I believe that if simple facts and practicalities are going to be continually ignored, policy makers need to understand the reality of the matter. The simple fact is that the geek contingent will always be one step ahead of government in these matters, which is why they need a carrot, not stick, approach. That is what I am trying to get across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
